And nobody seemed to have a problem with that.
I realise that there wasn't the graphic realism that we have today. I refuse to let me 11-year old play Call of Duty or Fallout 3 or anything like them, much to his disgust. All his friends do, he whines. And it's true, they do. But he's not. I'm afraid that's the cost of having a games-savvy dad.
Death, in all its gory glory! |
I don't think that it is. It's a far cry from Who Dares Wins II to Battlefield 1942. There's a big difference between seeing someone's blown-out eye flying up the road in super-slo-mo and seeing a dead sprite disappear. So if the lad wants to play 8-bit games or arcade games from the Eighties, I'll let him. I played them when I was about his age, so I can't really have any objections, even if the aims are technically the same. The other stuff... that can wait.
I wrote this on Thursday, never got to submit it and then was out on Friday night. So this is a bit late!
ReplyDeleteYou're not alone. My best friend wouldn't let his son play Call of Duty type games until he was about 15. Even I stopped playing realistically violent games a couple of years ago as it no longer felt right.
ReplyDeleteMaybe I'm hypocritical too - because I'll still play Who Dares Wins II. Talking of which, what a great game! I got it as part of this compilation:
http://www.computinghistory.org.uk/det/1930/4-Zzap-Sizzlers-for-CBM-64-128/
Hopefully Steve Evans is on your list somewhere.
I think it's that reason, that modern shooters are so realistic, that I was "dissuaded" from using those sorts of 8-bit games in my BBC filming. Although Commando was the only game I could get to load properly on the first day, so off we played that hah hah...
ReplyDelete